ofcourseitshappeninginyourhead:
Scumbag Dumbledore
Well no because Buckbeak was always saved by future Harry and Hermione going into the past.
It’s like people have no idea how time travel works.
If you go back in time to save a hippogriff to rescue Sirius Black, you were always going to do that. In fact you’ve already done that, but that was future you and now current you needs to go do that.
You aren’t making any sense. There was still a disparity in while Buckbeak was in fact dead between when he was executed and when Dumbledore sent them to save him with the Time Turners. What difference does it make if the disparity is a few hours or 14 years?
Each turn of the Time Turner is an hour I read, so if Harry was 13-14 when they first got the time turner that would mean the amount of spins would be crazy
I don’t know if I’m calculating this right, but there’s 365 days in a year
so 13x365 = 4745 days, so 4745 days times 24 hours for each = 113,880 spins
and if he were 14 it would be 122,640 spins
although a little less then that because he wasn’t exactly 1 hour years old so however old he was at the time
that’s a lot of spins - I don’t think Time Turners can handle that? It seems like the wouldn’t be able to but who knows.
I don’t know this probably doesn’t apply to you guy’s comments but this is just something I wanted to mention, that it would take a longgggg time to spin enough to get back to Harry’s parents. I’m just disputing the meme a little bit.
^ Also another good point.
Wow this is like a proper Nerd Debate.
This always puzzled me :33
Reblogging because I love a good debate :)
If they had gone back in time, and if they did spend so many days spinning all 122,640 times. If Voldemort had never killed Lily and James, Lily would never have put that charm on Harry. This would mean Voldemort would never have been vanquished (the first time nor the last time) and most likely ruled the world.
Also, if you will remember, they cannot go forward in time with the time turner. Once they saved buckbeak they had to live the remaining time in the past until the point at which they traveled. Harry would have to return to his third year as a 25 year old. To use time-turners to stop every bad thing that happened there would be multiples of the same people everywhere. It is only logical to prevent events which only happened a short time ago.
Further, one can not change fixed points in time. It had already been determined that the Potters were dead. One could not go back and change that. Although it was suggested to the trio that Buckbeak was dead we come to find out that he never had been in the first place.
So basically, Hermione has probably gained several weeks just by using the time turner. Interesting…
ofcourseitshappeninginyourhead:
Scumbag Dumbledore
Well no because Buckbeak was always saved by future Harry and Hermione going into the past.
It’s like people have no idea how time travel works.
If you go back in time to save a hippogriff to rescue Sirius Black, you were always going to do that. In fact you’ve already done that, but that was future you and now current you needs to go do that.
You aren’t making any sense. There was still a disparity in while Buckbeak was in fact dead between when he was executed and when Dumbledore sent them to save him with the Time Turners. What difference does it make if the disparity is a few hours or 14 years?
Each turn of the Time Turner is an hour I read, so if Harry was 13-14 when they first got the time turner that would mean the amount of spins would be crazy
I don’t know if I’m calculating this right, but there’s 365 days in a year
so 13x365 = 4745 days, so 4745 days times 24 hours for each = 113,880 spins
and if he were 14 it would be 122,640 spins
although a little less then that because he wasn’t exactly 1 hour years old so however old he was at the time
that’s a lot of spins - I don’t think Time Turners can handle that? It seems like the wouldn’t be able to but who knows.
I don’t know this probably doesn’t apply to you guy’s comments but this is just something I wanted to mention, that it would take a longgggg time to spin enough to get back to Harry’s parents. I’m just disputing the meme a little bit.
^ Also another good point.
Wow this is like a proper Nerd Debate.
This always puzzled me :33
Reblogging because I love a good debate :)
If they had gone back in time, and if they did spend so many days spinning all 122,640 times. If Voldemort had never killed Lily and James, Lily would never have put that charm on Harry. This would mean Voldemort would never have been vanquished (the first time nor the last time) and most likely ruled the world.
Also, if you will remember, they cannot go forward in time with the time turner. Once they saved buckbeak they had to live the remaining time in the past until the point at which they traveled. Harry would have to return to his third year as a 25 year old. To use time-turners to stop every bad thing that happened there would be multiples of the same people everywhere. It is only logical to prevent events which only happened a short time ago.
Further, one can not change fixed points in time. It had already been determined that the Potters were dead. One could not go back and change that. Although it was suggested to the trio that Buckbeak was dead we come to find out that he never had been in the first place.
So basically, Hermione has probably gained several weeks just by using the time turner. Interesting…
